Everything about Drug Policy Of The Netherlands totally explained
The
drug policy of the Netherlands is based on 2 principles:
- Drug use is a public health issue, not a criminal matter
- A distinction between hard drugs and soft drugs exists
Netherlands has a high anti-drug related public expenditure, the second highest drug related public expenditure per capita of all countries in
EU (after Sweden). 75% is law enforcement expenditures including police, army, law courts, prisons, customs and finance guards. 25% is health and social care expenditures including treatment, harm reduction, health research and educational including prevention and social affairs interventions.
It is a
pragmatic policy. Most policymakers in the Netherlands believe that if a problem has proved to be unsolvable, it's better to try controlling it instead of continuing to enforce laws with mixed results. By comparison, most other countries take the point of view that drugs are detrimental to society and must therefore be outlawed, even when such policies fail to eliminate drug use. This has caused friction between the Netherlands and other countries, most notably with
France and
Germany. As of 2004,
Belgium seems to be moving toward the Dutch model and a few local German legislators are calling for experiments based on the Dutch model.
Switzerland has had long and heated parliamentary debates about whether to follow the Dutch model, but finally decided against it in 2004; currently a
ballot initiative is in the works on the question. In the last few years certain strains of
marijuana with higher concentrations of
THC and
drug tourism have challenged the current policy and led to a re-examination of the current approach.
Public health
Large-scale dealing, production, import and export are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, even if this doesn't supply end users or
coffeeshops with more than the allowed amounts. Exactly how coffeeshops get their supplies is rarely investigated, however.
What is certain is that coffeeshops do sell
cannabis that comes from countries where it's illegal. The average concentration of
THC in the cannabis sold in coffeeshops has increased from 9% 1998 to 18% 2005. One of the reasons is
plant breeding and use of
greenhouse technology for illegal growing of marijuana in Netherlands..
The recent minister of Justice Piet Hein Donner announced in June 2007 that cultivation of cannabis shall continue to be illegal.
Non-enforcement
Cannabis remains a controlled substance in the Netherlands and both possession and production for personal use are still
misdemeanors, punishable by fine. Coffee shops are also technically illegal according to the statutes but, as has been said, are flourishing nonetheless.
However, a policy of non-enforcement has led to a situation where reliance upon non-enforcement has become common, and because of this the courts have ruled against the government when individual cases were prosecuted.
This is because the
Dutch Ministry of Justice applies a
gedoogbeleid (policy of tolerance or allowance policy) with regard to soft drugs: an official set of guidelines telling public prosecutors under which circumstances offenders shouldn't be prosecuted. This is a more official version of the common practice in other countries, in which law enforcement sets priorities as to which offenses are important enough to spend limited resources on.
Proponents of
gedoogbeleid argue that such a policy offers more consistency in legal protection in practice, than without it.
Opponents of the Dutch drug policy either call for full legalization, or argue that laws should penalize morally wrong or decadent behavior, whether this is enforceable or not.
In the Dutch courts, however, it has long been determined that the institutionalized non-enforcement of statutes with well defined limits constitutes
de facto decriminalization. The statutes are kept on the books mainly due to international pressure and in adherence with international treaties.
Drug law enforcement
Despite the high priority given by the Dutch government to fighting narcotics trafficking, the Netherlands continue to be an important transit point for drugs entering Europe, a major producer and leading distributor of
amphetamines and other synthetic drugs, and a medium consumer of illicit drugs . The Netherlands' special synthetic drug unit, set up in 1997 to coordinate the fight against
designer drugs, appears to be successful. The government has intensified cooperation with neighbouring countries and stepped up border controls. In recent years, it also introduced so-called 100% checks and bodyscans at
Schiphol Airport on incoming flights from Dutch overseas territories
Aruba and
Netherlands Antilles to prevent importing cocaine by means of
swallowing balloons by
mules.
Although drug use, as opposed to
trafficking, is seen primarily as a public health issue, responsibility for drug policy is shared by both the Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sports, and the Ministry of Justice.
In contrast with most countries' policies, the Dutch policy has yielded almost universally positive results in the "war against drugs". The Netherlands spends more than €130 million annually on facilities for addicts, of which about fifty percent goes to drug addicts. The Netherlands has extensive demand reduction programs, reaching about ninety percent of the country's 25,000 to 28,000 hard drug users. The number of hard drug addicts has stabilized in the past few years and their average age has risen to 38 years, which is generally seen as a positive trend. Notably, the number of drug-related deaths in the country remains the lowest in Europe.
On
27 November 2003, the Dutch Justice Minister Piet Hein Donner announced that his government was considering rules under which coffeeshops would only be allowed to sell soft drugs to Dutch residents in order to satisfy both European neighbours' concerns about the influx of drugs from the Netherlands, as well as those of Netherlands border town residents unhappy with the influx of "drug tourists" from elsewhere in Europe.
As of 2006 nothing has come of this proposal and Dutch coffeehouses still enjoy robust foreign patronage. The proposal is unlikely to come to part in practice since refusing citizens of neighbouring nations any services of the sort conflicts with the European Union's policies surrounding the
four freedoms.
The results of drug policy in Netherlands
In the Netherlands 9.7% of young boys consume soft drugs once a month, comparable to the level in Italy (10.9%) and Germany (9.9%) and less than in the UK (15.8%) and Spain (16.4%), but much higher than in, for example, Sweden (3%), Finland or Greece. Dutch rates of drug use are lower than U.S. rates in every category. The monthly prevalence of drugs other than cannabis among young people (15-24) was 4% in 2004, that was above the average (3%) of 15 compared countries in
EU. However, seemingly few transcends to becoming
problem drug users (0.3%), well below the average (0.52%) of the same compared countries. The Dutch government is able to support approximately 90% of help seeking addicts with detoxification programs. Treatment demand is rising.
Implications of international law
The Netherlands is a party to the
1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, the 1971
Convention on Psychotropic Substances, and the 1988
United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. The 1961 convention prohibits cultivation and trade of naturally-occurring drugs such as cannabis; the 1971 treaty bans the manufacture and trafficking of synthetic drugs such as barbiturates and amphetamines; and the 1988 convention requires states to criminalize illicit drug possession:
» Subject to its constitutional principles and the basic concepts of its legal system, each Party shall adopt such measures as may be necessary to establish as a criminal offence under its domestic law, when committed intentionally, the possession, purchase or cultivation of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances for personal consumption contrary to the provisions of the 1961 Convention, the 1961 Convention as amended or the 1971 Convention.
The
International Narcotics Control Board typically interprets this provision to mean that states must prosecute drug possession offenses. The conventions clearly state that controlled substances are to be restricted to scientific and medical uses. However,
Cindy Fazey, former Chief of Demand Reduction for the
United Nations Drug Control Programme, believes that the treaties have enough ambiguities and loopholes to allow some room to maneuver. In her report entitled
The Mechanics and Dynamics of the UN System for International Drug Control, she notes:
» Many countries have now decided not to use the full weight of criminal sanctions against people who are in possession of drugs that are for their personal consumption. The Conventions say that there must be an offence under domestic criminal law, it doesn't say that the law has to be enforced, or that when it's what sanctions should apply. . . . Despite such grey areas latitude is by no means unlimited. The centrality of the principle of limiting narcotic and psychotropic drugs for medical and scientific purposes leaves no room for the legal possibility of recreational use. . . . Nations may currently be pushing the boundaries of the international system, but the pursuit of any action to formally legalize non-medical and non-scientific drug use would require either treaty revision or a complete or partial withdrawal from the current regime.
The Dutch policy of keeping anti-drug laws on the books while limiting enforcement of certain offenses is carefully designed to reduce harm while still complying with the letter of international drug control treaties. This is necessary in order to avoid criticism from the International Narcotics Board, which historically has taken a dim view of any moves to relax official drug policy. In their annual report, the Board has criticised many governments, including
Canada, for permitting the medicinal use of cannabis,
Australia for providing injecting rooms and the
United Kingdom for proposing to downgrade the classification of cannabis,
(External Link
) which it has since done (although this change was reversed by the home secretary on 7th May, 2008)
Recent developments
In 2005,
Gerd Leers, mayor of the border city of
Maastricht, criticised the current policy as inconsistent, by recording a song with the Dutch punk rock band
De Heideroosjes. By allowing possession and retail sales of cannabis, but not cultivation or wholesale, the government creates numerous problems of crime and public safety, he alleges, and therefore he'd like to switch to either legalising and regulating production, or to the full repression that his party (
CDA) officially advocates. The latter suggestion has widely been interpreted as rhetorical.
(External Link
) Leers's comments have garnered support from other local authorities and put the cultivation issue back on the agenda.
By 2009, 27
coffee shops selling cannabis in
Rotterdam, all within 200 meters from schools, must close down. This is nearly half of the
coffeeshops that currently operate within its municipality. This is due to a new policy of city mayor Ivo Opstelten and the town council. The higher levels of the active ingredient in marijuana in Netherlands create a growing opposition against the traditional Dutch view of cannabis as a relatively innocent soft drug. Closing of
coffeeshops isn't unique for Rotterdam. Many other towns have done the same in the last 10 years.
Bill banning "Magic mushrooms"
In
April 25,
2008, the Dutch government, backed by a majority of members of parliament, decided to ban cultivation and use of
hallucinogenic or "
magic mushrooms", dried or fresh.
The ban is referred as a new retreat from liberal drug policies
Supply control
The recent increase in cocaine trafficking in has focused attention on the Caribbean area. Since early 2003, a special law court with prison facilities has been operational at Schiphol airport. Since the beginning of 2005, there has been 100 % control of all flights from key countries in the Caribbean. In 2004, an average 290 drug couriers per month were arrested, decreasing to 80 per month by early 2006.
[Further Information]
Get more info on 'Drug Policy Of The Netherlands'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://drug_policy_of_the_netherlands.totallyexplained.com">Drug policy of the Netherlands Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |